PRODSovereign European BaaS platformOpen Dashboard →

Comparisons · 6 min read

Aurabase vs PocketBase: when to go single-binary?

Affane Daylami · Fondateur · August 22, 2026

Back to blog

PocketBase is an open source backend that fits into a single binary of around 15 MB, deliberately minimal. Aurabase is a complete platform — auth, database, real-time, storage, edge functions, AI — designed to grow. Neither is wrong: the question is where your project stands today.

This English text was generated automatically from the French original and has not been reviewed yet.

The essentials

PocketBase wins on simplicity of deployment: one binary, embedded SQLite, zero dependencies. Aurabase wins when the project needs true multi-tenancy, advanced Row Level Security, documented GDPR compliance or native NL2SQL/RAG on Postgres. PocketBase currently has no official voice on this comparison — the narrative is currently carried by unaffiliated third parties (leanware.co, dev.to, StackShare).

#
Deployment

Mono-binary versus containerized platform

The main advantage of PocketBase is real and it must be named honestly: a single downloaded binary, no external dependencies, a server that starts in a few seconds with an embedded SQLite base. For a prototype, a personal app, or a low-traffic project, it's hard to beat for simplicity.

Aurabase assumes the opposite compromise: several services (gateway, auth, database, realtime, storage, functions, IA), deployed via Kubernetes (k3d locally or Helm chart in production). More components to orchestrate, in exchange for capabilities that a single binary doesn't cover — multi-tenant RLS, real-time CDC, native AI.

#
Database

Embedded SQLite versus dedicated PostgreSQL 16

PocketBase uses embedded SQLite: excellent for reading, with known write concurrency limits under heavy concurrent load — SQLite locks the entire base during a write, which becomes a limiting factor as the number of active users increases.

Aurabase provides a dedicated PostgreSQL 16 per project — no shared engine instance. The Postgres image supporting pgvector 0.8.6 and pg_graphql, with no documented equivalent on the PocketBase side.

Nuance to know

pgvector 0.8.6 is already present in the standard upstream CNPG image that Aurabase uses — it is not an Aurabase addition per se. pg_graphql, on the other hand, is packaged natively by Aurabase in its tenant image, without any manual configuration step on the user side.

#
Editorial honesty

When PocketBase is more than enough

A prototype, a personal project, a low-traffic internal tool without the need for advanced RLS policies or native AI: PocketBase covers this ground very well, with an operational load close to zero. To claim that Aurabase is consistently the best choice would be dishonest — in this case, that's not true.

The integrated administration of PocketBase (web interface, collection management) also remains quicker to learn for a solo developer who is new to backend development. If you are instead evaluating a multi-service self-hosted platform, see also our comparison Aurabase vs Appwrite.

#
Scaling up

When a project exceeds PocketBase

The clearest switching signal: a real multi-tenant need (several organizations isolated in the same database), GDPR compliance to be formally documented for a client or a DPO, or a native RAG/NL2SQL capacity rather than a third-party assembly.

A team that grows beyond a single trusted maintainer also feels this tipping point: Aurabase's Row Level Security Postgres allows complex access rules to be declared directly in SQL, without centralizing all the business logic on the application server side.

#
Migration

Migrate from PocketBase to a Postgres backend

There is currently no Aurabase migration guide dedicated specifically to PocketBase — PocketBase's embedded SQLite does not have direct export to a relational PostgreSQL schema: each collection must be reviewed before becoming a table. PocketBase itself does not publish any outbound migration guide to another backend.

The Supabase → Aurabase migration guide remains the best reference on transferable mechanics (structure of RLS policies, SDK replacement), even if the starting point is not PostgreSQL in the case of PocketBase.

#
Overview

What distinguishes the two platforms

DeploymentKubernetes / Helm (k3d locally), several servicesSingle binary, ~15 MB, zero dependencies
DatabasePostgreSQL 16 dedicated per project, native RLSEmbedded SQLite, one file
Native AIIntegrated NL2SQL and RAG, embedded pgvectorNo documented native AI capabilities
GDPR complianceDedicated content pillar + verified EU infrastructureUntreated, no official voice on this ground
Official voice on this comparisonThis comparison, published by AurabaseNone — narrative carried by unaffiliated third parties
#
Frequently Asked Questions

FAQs

Does PocketBase have multi-server mode?+
PocketBase has long been designed to run on a single server (embedded SQLite). Check the up-to-date official PocketBase documentation before stating a specific limit on this point — this comparison has not double-checked it as of publication date.
Is there any official PocketBase documentation comparing to other BaaS?+
No. PocketBase has no official editorial blog: the available comparative content comes exclusively from unaffiliated third parties (leanware.co, dev.to, StackShare), not from the project maintainer.
Can we migrate a PocketBase project to Aurabase easily?+
Not directly. SQLite does not have native export to PostgreSQL: each PocketBase collection must be reviewed and restructured before import, there is no automatic conversion script published to date.

READY TO DEPLOY?

Your backend in five minutes.

No credit card required · 500 MB free · 50,000 MAU